For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed Me: for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writing, how shall ye believe My words? John 5:46-47The Hoax of Higher Criticism
Gary North
The two must successful attacks on Christianity in the modern world have been biblical higher criticism and Darwinism. The men who pioneered the "high criticism" of the Bible did not believe that Jesus was who He said He was: the promised Messiah, the incarnate Son of God. To transmit their unbelief to their intellectual peers, and from them to the general public, the higher critics did their best to remove people's faith in Moses. If they could prove the Old Testament is unreliable, they could by implication demonstrate that Jesus was misinformed about Moses, and therefore that He was equally unreliable. Higher criticism is cultic, utterly groundless speculation. This is a short, clear introduction to the topic.
For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed Me: for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writing, how shall ye believe My words? John 5:46-47
The men who pioneered the "higher criticism" of the Bible did not believe that Jesus was who He sad He was: the promised Messiah, the incarnate Son of God. To transmit their unbelief to their intellectual peers, and from them to the general public, the higher critics did their best to remove people's faith in Moses. If they could prove that the Old Testament is unreliable, they could by implication demonstrate that Jesus was misinformed about Moses, and therefore that He was equally unreliable.
The two most successful attacks on Christianity in the modern world have been biblical higher criticism and Darwinism. Both views stem from the same source: a view of man as a social creature who lives in an evolving society. Both views substitute a philosophy of autonomous historical process for the biblical philosophy of creation, fall, redemption, and final judgment.
Biblical higher criticism affects men's choice of ethics. It especially affects their social ethics.
What is seldom understood is that biblical higher criticism arose in England in the late seventeenth century as a reaction to the use of the Old Testament as a guide for civil law. Higher criticism was an important tool in the humanists' war against Christian civilization. They won that phase of the battle. It has taken three centuries for even a handful of Christians to return once again to the Bible (including the Old Testament) in search of social guidelines. This quest necessitates a rejection of the techniques of biblical higher criticism. Until Christians abandon higher criticism and its evolutionary social presuppositions (disguised as conclusions), they will remain in cultural bondage.
Order on Amazon: 0930464303
Year of Publication: 1989
Conspiracy, Forgery, and Higher Criticism